Stocks to Watch Hot Stocks Penny stocks Stock Picks Stock Alerts Penny Stock Advice Penny Stocks The Bull Report

Paula Gordon: A True Radical, a Great Man

Green is good for business. Not greenwash, GREEN. By working with nature rather than despoiling nature, Ray Anderson has led his company to high levels of success and profitability.

Ray Anderson died this week, of cancer. And the cancer is not incidental to this story. Ray was a friend and an inspiration. A lot of people talk about the environment. Ray did something. A lot of people say that we have to choose between a livable environment and a prosperous economy. Ray showed them that they were wrong, and he did it in an industry which is one of the most toxic around. Though it is impossible to know with absolute certainty precisely what causes a cancer, Ray spent much of his early career in the old-fashioned carpet industry … one which used (and still uses) bioactive, petroleum-based chemicals to manufacture the carpets. There’s a very good chance that long-term exposure to those chemicals caused the cancer that killed Ray.

In 1994, Ray read Paul Hawken’s The Ecology of Commerce. Ever after he characterized that experience as a “spear through the chest.”

Quite simply, Ray realized that the industry in which he was making his fortune was killing the earth and he did the only reasonable thing; he committed his company (Interface) to becoming, much more than just sustainable, restorative.

The last time we talked with Ray, we talked about that journey which he came to call “climbing mount sustainability.” He tells the story of that journey in Confessions of a Radical Industrialist. It is a story everyone needs to hear. It is a story which gives the lie to the self-serving arguments of those who believe that money is more important than life … their money, your life. As a stark choice, most of us who are not certifiably nuts would choose A (life) over B (money). So, the profiteers obfuscate the choice. Taking their cue from the tobacco industry, they spend millions on denial, distraction and diversion. And they buy politicians.

What Ray did, bless him, was to demonstrate that the life-versus-wealth argument is all wrong. All that is required is honesty and imagination and really good business skills … and the willingness to work like hell to bring one’s vision to fruition. Ray fit the bill.

We will miss Ray. We would have missed him even more had he not shown us that we can rise above parochial self-interest. Call it enlightened self-interest. Call it leadership. Call it a good man who did an astonishing amount to make our world better. Call it a challenge to each of us to do so well.

•••

Business on HuffingtonPost.com

Great Expressions Dental Centers Acquires Goodman Orthodontics in Novi, MI

BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI–(Marketwire – Aug 8, 2011) – Great Expressions Dental Centers (GEDC) announced it has acquired the Goodman Orthodontics practice of Dr. Sindy Goodman DDS, MS and Dr. Robert Goodman DDS, MS located in Novi, Michigan.
Marketwire – Mergers and Acquisitions

Nothing Great About the Good Jobs Number

Here’s the bad news about today’s jobs report: It proves once and for all that we are in a slow growth economy. And that’s worse news than you think. Next to recent headlines, of course, most people would take slow growth. For the past few weeks, more and more forecasters have been saying that the [...]
The Curious Capitalist

Great Expressions Dental Centers Acquires Wright Dental Care in Belleair Bluffs, FL

BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI–(Marketwire – Jul 7, 2011) – Great Expressions Dental Centers (GEDC) announced it has acquired the Wright Dental Care practice of Dr. Scott Wright DMD, FACP and Dr. Elizabeth Hevia-Wright DMD, located in Belleair Bluffs, Florida.
Marketwire – Mergers and Acquisitions

Barry Silbert: The Great Disconnect: American Jobs, Global Competitiveness & The Stock Market

Last month, I was invited by Congress to testify at a hearing about capital formation. It was a terrific opportunity for me to discuss topics critical to the future of our country, and offer my thoughts on the regulatory hurdles facing private companies in this country. SEC Chairman Mary Schapiro also testified, and I was pleased to hear that the Commission is earnestly assessing the state of the public stock markets and the usefulness of decades-old rules governing capital formation.

The hearing, convened by the Committee on Government Oversight and Reform, was a tangible step towards correcting outdated rules and regulations to assist American growth-stage companies. In fact, the House Financial Services Committee introduced a bill this week to revise one of the outdated rules. That’s the good news. The bad news is that many Americans are unaware that the U.S. public stock markets no longer support growth-stage companies. Systemic changes have caused companies to remain private far longer than in previous decades, potentially impacting job creation and American global competitiveness.

This post is the first in a series where I will summarize my testimony and address three interconnected but distinct topics: (1) The Past: The Systemic Problems in the U.S. Public Stock Markets; (2) The Present: The Role of SecondMarket and the Private Company Stock Market; and (3) The Future: Proposed Regulatory Changes to Support Growth-Stage Companies.

Part One – The Past

For several decades, startup companies in the U.S. followed a familiar path — they raised angel capital, a few rounds of venture capital, and went public within five years. The vast majority of IPOs were for companies raising million or less, even adjusted for inflation. Smaller public companies could thrive in the public markets, with equity research coverage and market makers driving investor interest in growth-stage companies. However, in recent years, the market structure changed and the public markets became inhospitable to smaller public companies.

Quite frankly, prior to SecondMarket’s involvement with private company stock, I did not understand the breadth and depth of the problems facing public companies in America. After analyzing the topic over the past few years, including reviewing research findings from leading industry observers, I came to appreciate the broad impact of the systemic changes in the market. Several factors have been recognized as contributing to the problems in the American public stock markets:

• Online Brokers – Although the introduction of online brokerages helped to make trading less expensive, these online brokers disintermediated retail brokers who helped buy, sell and market small-cap, under-the-radar public companies to investors. Stockbrokers collectively made hundreds of thousands of calls per day to their clients to discuss small-cap equity opportunities; they were not calling to recommend buying shares of IBM or Procter & Gamble. The proliferation of online brokerages decimated the profession and removed a critical marketing tool for the country’s small-cap companies.

• Decimalization – Stock prices used to be quoted in fractions (e.g., the price of Company A was 10¼ or 10½). The difference between fractions created profit for firms providing market making, research and sales support. When the markets began quoting prices in decimals (e.g., now Company A is .25 or .26), trading spreads were reduced and profits were significantly cut. It became unprofitable to market small-cap equity because there was inadequate trading volume in the small-cap companies. In other words, the penny spreads were not adding up to support the traders and research analysts covering smaller companies.

• Sarbanes-Oxley – The legislation is a popular punching bag in Washington and is often blamed for the lack of IPOs; however, many observers believe it is not the most significant factor in companies electing to remain private. Nonetheless, corporate compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has certainly increased costs for public companies.

• Global Research Settlement - After decimalization began, in an effort to continue writing research reports, Wall Street began funding research with investment banking profits. Not surprisingly, once the practice began, conflicts of interest emerged and positive equity reports began to be written for undesirable companies. It’s difficult for research analysts to write objective reports about companies that are also investment banking clients! State attorneys general got involved, eventually leading to the global research settlement. The result was that research reports stopped being written for small-cap public companies and, consequently, a significant marketing mechanism for those companies was eliminated.

• High-Frequency Trading – Although high-frequency traders bring significant liquidity to the public markets, they require the volume and velocity that can only be found in trading stock of larger public companies. A recent report stated that high-frequency traders conduct more than half of the trades in the U.S. equity market. High-frequency traders essentially ignore small-cap companies because there is insufficient liquidity in small companies to support high-frequency trading objectives.

• Average Hold Period - Over the past forty years, the average time that a public market investor holds stock has dropped from approximately five years in 1970 to less than three months today. Investors now focus their attention on short-term earnings performance, rather than long-term, business-building initiatives.

Virtually all of these developments emerged from either well-intentioned policy decisions or the natural evolution of the markets in an electronic age. Nonetheless, taken in the aggregate, these (and other) factors have made the public markets undesirable for many companies. Throughout the 1980s and 1990s, the regulatory environment and overall market structure actively supported high-growth private companies joining the public markets. From 1991 to 2000, there was an average of 520 IPOs per year, with a peak of 756 IPOs in 1996.

Today, the lack of a properly functioning public market structure is strikingly obvious. Since 2001, the United States has averaged only 126 IPOs per year, with 38 in 2008, 61 in 2009 and 71 in 2010. Companies are electing to remain private longer than in previous decades, and the average time a company remains private has essentially doubled in recent years.

Simply put, the lackluster IPO market is not providing the solution for investors and early employees who need liquidity. M&A is an alternative option for companies to obtain liquidity; however, acquisitions often result in job losses and stifled innovation. The growth market is a significant and vital part of the capital formation process, and the systemic failure of the US capital markets to support healthy IPOs inhibits our economy’s ability to create jobs, innovate and grow.

Over the past few years, I have developed relationships with executives at numerous private companies. These executives are concerned that they are not ready or able to successfully navigate the public markets, which increasingly cater to traders, rather than investors. They are concerned about regulatory hurdles that restrict their ability to remain private. They are concerned about the proliferation of high-frequency trading and the casino-like atmosphere in the public markets. They are concerned that when traders own stock for weeks (or seconds), they don’t care about company fundamentals or long-term objectives. They are concerned about activist shareholders. They are concerned about managing to quarterly earnings when they’re trying to build something long-term.

Clearly, a new growth market must emerge. In my next post, I’ll discuss how SecondMarket can be part of the solution.

Business on HuffingtonPost.com

Fisher Communications Announces Agreement to Sell Its Great Falls, Montana Radio Stations

SEATTLE, WA–(Marketwire – Jun 15, 2011) – Fisher Communications, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSCI), a leader in local media innovation, announced today that it has entered into a definitive agreement to sell its six Great Falls, Montana radio stations to STARadio Corp., which is based in Quincy, Illinois. The financial terms of the transaction were not disclosed.
Marketwire – Mergers and Acquisitions

U.S. Foodservice Acquires Great Western Meats, Inc.

ROSEMONT, IL–(Marketwire – May 23, 2011) – U.S. Foodservice, one of America’s leading foodservice distributors to restaurants, hospitals, schools and other organizations, today announced the purchase of Great Western Meats, a broadline foodservice distributor and provider of fresh-cut portion meats in Central Florida.
Marketwire – Mergers and Acquisitions

Tom Doctoroff: Consumers vs. Corporations: China’s Great Digital Divide

China’s technologically liberated consumers are ready for a digital commercial revolution. But manufacturers and their communications partners — advertising agencies, both digital and traditional, as well as media companies — are letting them down by not approaching the sector strategically.

Liberation for Everyman

It is difficult to overstate the impact China’s launch into cyberspace has made for Middle Kingdom’s Everyman. Today, the country boasts 500 million netizens, 150 million of whom have access to high-speed Internet; 200 million bloggers; 100 million micro-bloggers (Chinese “Twitterers”) and 800 million mobile phone users. Digital technology has been secularized. No longer used only by young urbanized hipsters, the sea change epic. Shielded by on-line anonymity, free wheeling surfers broadcast accomplishments, weigh in on current events, download porn, hook up for sex, release rage through violent video games, criticize the government (gingerly), and plug into virtual communities. True, China’s Great Digital Firewall extinguishes hints of collective protest. But Westerners overestimate the constrictive effect of 50,000 net nannies. Denizens of the People’s Republic have more opportunities to explore the world and are freer to express views than any time in history. None of this would have been possible without the Internet.

For bargain-crazy consumers, the rise of e-tailers presages an era of commercial Nirvana. According to the China Internet Network Information Center (CNNIC), in 2010, 40 million Chinese booked hotel rooms, airline tickets and holiday tours on travel websites such as C-trip. On-line activity accounted for only an 2% of total 2009 retail spending, up from 1% in 2008; however, rates in coastal cities are already much higher. Alipay, e-commerce behemoth Alibaba’s version of PayPal, has made skittish, reassurance-driven consumers more at ease conducting digital transactions. (China has historically been a “cash is king” society. But consumers are increasingly comfortable spending on-line as long as they can inspect merchandise before transactions are completed.) On-line emporiums such as Taobao have emboldened shoppers to ruthlessly compare prices, realigning the balance of power between buyer and seller.

Brand Conventionality

For most brands, unfortunately, the digital revolution has not been harnessed. Few have exploited on-line tools to lift profit margins. Virtual consumerism is even more commoditized than in the bricks and mortar world. (Few smart phone users are willing to actually pay money for apps.) As a rule, cyberspace has been carpet bombed with promotional cheap fixes, with zero message consistency or insight into the emotional drivers of netizens. Yes, there are exceptions. PepsiCo’s “Get on the Can” Challenge provided ego-driven youth a platform to shine, literally, by emblazoning faces on cola packages. In the process, the campaign generated 600 million hits. Ford’s “21 Day Excitement” competition employed on-line canvassing to select ten “everyday superstars” to morph from “bland to bold,” dramatizing its “Make Every Day Exciting” proposition. To promote the N-series range, Nokia’s “Bruce Lee Reborn” viral and Ovi app campaign connected surfers to an icon of Chinese masculinity. Most of the time, however, China’s digital landscape resembles a real world bazaar: noisy and clanging, promotion-happy, discount-driven, with the vast majority of on-line advertising slapped onto highly trafficked portals (e.g., Sina, Baidu, QQ) as banner ads.

Required: A New Brand Building Vision

The communications industry must lift its game to harness the energy released by China’s digital big bang. To do that, we need a North Star.

The Brand Idea: Still Sacred. Without the unifying power of the Brand Idea, conceptual chaos erupts. For decades, advertisers’ responsibility has been to forge brand ideas that evolve, but do not fundamentally change, over time. They are rooted in insight, the fundamental motivations of consumers. Through sports shoes, we buck against societal convention to Just Do It on the basketball court. Through engagement rings, we demonstrate enduring passion because “A (DeBeers) Diamond is Forever.”

Brand engagement occurs over the airwaves, in the supermarket aisle via blue tooth, through the latest iPhone app, or an on-line loyalty program. And the brand idea, the long-term relationship between consumer and product, is at the center of it all. Apple’s “Think Different,” Kit Kat’s “Have a Break,” Axe’s “Chick Magnet,” Rejoice shampoo’s “Confidence from Softness,” or Pepsi’s “New Generation Choice” is the unifying core, order’s gravitational force. The industry must acknowledge new technological experiences are never, in and of themselves, ideas. Instead, they allow consumers to engage with ideas in new ways. True, marketers are often digitally “clever.” Headlines such as “P&G turns virtual makeover app into Max Factor contest,” “Budlime launch ties into Tudou’s first drama series” and “Unilever links hot steam with warm wishes in Lipton contest” are common. But they rarely reinforce an enduring brand idea. New media titillation has led to digital promiscuity.

From Passive Consumption to Active Participation. The fundamental role of the brand will not change as a result of China’s digital liberation. Indeed, as brand options multiply and media costs skyrocket, the need to minimize consumer disorientation is more urgent than ever. However, the one-to-one nature of digital expression provides opportunities to deepen and broaden involvement. “Creative ideas” can become “engagement ideas,” transforming passive exposure into active participation. Advertising agencies should no longer produce work that “interrupts.” Instead, we should “make things” – content -people want to spent time with. DeBeers “Love World,” a microsite where young men express commitment by creating a virtual world of “omnipresent” love, is the shape of things to come. So is Nike Plus, a hi-tech manifestation of the “Just Do It” spirit that enables runners to compete with athletes anytime and anywhere on the planet. Axe’s “sexy wake up call,” an app that brings the product’s “masculine irresistibility” into the bedroom, demonstrates technology’s power to reinforce a core brand proposition.

Consumption of communications via digital devices – mobile phones, tablets, computers, etc. – is revolutionary because manufacturers no longer “broadcast” messages. Through a bewildering array of channels, engagement is one-to-one, between marketer and users or between users themselves. “Content” is played with, commented on, expanded upon, competed with and exchanged within “brand communities.” Corporations need to accept their ability to “control” messaging – how a product is positioned, how brands are commented on publicly – will never be the same. (A caveat: broadcast media will never be eclipsed as the primary means of defining propositions. China, a country in which consumers have relatively limited inexperience in digesting brands, requires simplicity. The 30-second television commercial, passively received, is an irreplaceable, albeit expensive, weapon in forging conceptual order. This is why international agencies and media companies operating in the PRC still earn almost all revenue from “traditional” advertising.)

The Communications Industry: Change Required

The digital engagement imperative presents four fundamental, and interrelated, challenges.

Real Time Measurement. First, our industry must hone its ability to measure the effectiveness of digital engagement ideas. Advertising agencies will forfeit legitimacy unless we are able to track, in real time, effectiveness. Broadcast media efficiency is a question of reach and frequency; digital creative, on the other hand, is measured via “stickiness,” “virality,” “click through rates,” “conversion to purchase,” and return on investment (ROI). Any strategic planning department worth its salt must maintain a robust analytics practice.

Continuous Engagement. Second, creative agencies must move away from only executing “campaigns” – discrete television and print “bursts” that announce product news – towards “continuous engagement planning.” In an era of technological liberation, there are infinite ways to connect consumers with brands and brand communities. We need to restructure operations to facilitate rapid creative response to real and virtual world developments. We must recruit “story managers” to produce “idea amplifiers,” “or “bite-sized idea sustainers” that maximize the buzz of a given engagement idea. Agencies should operate as “newsrooms,” focused on the big story but flexible enough to cut and thrust as consumer react to creative stimulus. As engagement ideas are manifested in ever-expanding forms, we must plug into a broader array of talent. From bloggers to videographers and on-line performance artists to app developers, we have no choice but to fling open windows and connect with cutting-edge creators. We will never have a monopoly on talent. Employees must survey the Brave New World and forge strategic partnerships with innovators. We must reach into the market for new alliances. We need to embrace expertise wherever it exists, lest we fade to irrelevance.

Digital Mainstreaming. Third, it is time to “mainstream” digital creative. Digital is not a “department” or “specialization,” and not a discrete profit center. It is a new media, incredibly potent, just as television was in the 1950s. And creativity remains at the center of the digital ecosystem. Global agencies must integrate digital savvy – genuine technological experimentation — into each account and creative group. Yes, in the interest of a healthy bottom line, certain disciplines – e.g., analytics, technology optimization, digital production, and project management – must reside within a centralized “experience” department. But digital adventurism must permeate the entire organization. Organizational structure must reflect a commitment to media neutrality.

Media Innovation. Finally, the “revenue war” between media companies and advertising agencies must end. Media shops will always excel in negotiating low rates with vendors based on volume. They also boast the administrative prowess to plan media across time and geography. But let’s call a spade a spade: the process-driven culture of traditional media companies is incompatible with idea-centric creativity. As the digital universe expands, “ideas” must increasingly “live through” media. In the post-broadcast era, ideas and how consumers experience them are inseparable. If this truth is ignored, investment will evaporate as binary clutter. Advertising agencies need the freedom to establish partnerships with, and derive revenue from, digital media owners. Development of innovative digital solutions must be a strategic imperative of all communications experts, including creative shops.

Chinese Enterprises: Vast Opportunity, Structural Limitations

The PRC, brand-obsessed and Internet-crazy, is ripe for a digital Great Leap Forward. The Chinese are passionate about social media, highly- developed technology platforms most brands have barely begun to exploit. Through on-line car clubs, digital baby-care communities and a hundred million micro-blogs, Middle Kingdom denizens have embraced social networks on a scale Westerns find difficult to fathom. But these burgeoning on-line communities only tangentially intersect with brands. By leveraging brand ideas, manufacturers can enlist the support of on-line opinion leaders. China is reassurance-driven market in which the importance of personal recommendations is difficult to overstate. It is time to: a) establish common cause with digital influencers to transform on-line communities into virtual brand villages, b) translate SNS affiliation into sustained dialog with individuals, c) monetize one-on-one interaction via on-line loyalty and customer relationship management (CRM) programs and d) elevate the long-term profit contribution of discrete customers.

Yes, the opportunity is vast. But the road to digital Utopia will be long and winding. Digital development in the PRC is constipated.

Primitive Suppliers. Suppliers are, by and large, unsophisticated. The only large “digital agencies” in China are on-line media agents; the majority place low-end banner ads and television commercials on “mass reach” websites or portals. These companies, many corrupted by rampant kickbacks, treat creative as an add-on “design service.” Revenue is based page views, not click-through. “Depth of engagement” – e.g., time spent with a digital idea – is still an abstruse concept. While investment in analytic tools has grown, few are sophisticated enough to measure or track ROI.

Limited Talent. Digital conceptual craftsmanship – the expression of brand ideas through digital media – is undeveloped. Most creative leaders remain tethered to the safety of “traditional” broadcast advertising. Senior digital talent is largely “imported” from abroad. The challenge of inculcating a passion for new technology while remaining faithful to brand building fundamentals is immense. This is particularly true in conservative China, a country that prizes concrete predictability and shies away from the untested – i.e., anything that does not guarantee fixed return.

Chronic Short-Termism. Even more critically, Chinese enterprises, like their agency brethren, are not structured to embrace the potential of digital brand building. Digital spending accounts for only 7% of total media activity. Television is still king. To boot, e-commerce is immature given the prevalence of on-line shopping. According to a recent study by Aquarius Asia, approximately one-third, or 142 million, of Chinese Internet users shop on-line. But most companies do not cater to the on-line market. Indeed, per Aquarius’ report, “The top 100 manufacturers of consumer goods are giving away a large share of their online potential. Three out of four major companies do not efficiently use sustainable tools like SEM (search engine marketing) or SEO (search engine optimization) to reach their target groups.”

China is a market that reveres scale and volume. Its largest companies are structured, and managed, to drive low-margin sales. Some enterprises, particularly within “strategic” industries, have made progress climbing up value ladders. But few have embraced “brand equity” as the lynchpin of sustainable price premiums. Shoddy corporate governance precludes CEOs from maximizing long-term shareholder return. Panicky marketing executives defer to omnipotent sales barons who enforce short-term promotional pushes; only the most enlightened leaders reject the belief that low price is a competitive weapon. The reign of independent fiefdoms – departmental warlordism – militates against trans-category collaboration for data collection, data base management and cross selling. Customer Relationship Management (CRM) – i.e., maximizing individual customer profit contribution over time – is still an alien concept. The Middle Kingdom’s business culture, therefore, remains antithetical to bold experimentation across digital domains.

……

In conclusion, Chinese consumers outpace Chinese corporations and agencies in exploring the new digital ecosystem. There are fundamental structural and cultural barriers that impede idea-centric, media-neutral advertising. Given the potential for digital engagement to redefine the relationship between consumers and brands, new media will transform the commercial and communications landscape. But, as always, progress will be agonizingly incremental.

Business on HuffingtonPost.com

Great Lakes Aviation, Ltd. Reports January 2011 Traffic

Visit StreetInsider.com at http://www.streetinsider.com/Press+Releases/Great+Lakes+Aviation%2C+Ltd.+Reports+January+2011+Traffic/6266524.html for the full story.
StreetInsider.com News Articles

Great Lakes Aviation, Ltd. Reports December 2010 Traffic

CHEYENNE, Wyo., Jan. 10, 2011 /PRNewswire/ — Great Lakes Aviation, Ltd. (OTC Bulletin Board: GLUX) today announced preliminary passenger traffic results for the month of December 2010 and year ending December 31, 2010.
DECEMBER 2010 AND YEAR ENDING STATISTICS
Dec-10
Dec-09
Change
Passengers Enplane
PR Newswire: Financial Services

Our members see BIG winners! Sign up now for the hottest stock alerts on the net!
close this

online games juegos gratis games online free games free online games
online game jogos online jeux gratuits giochi gratis oyunlar